LibraryReference articles
Square a small move of size 0.01 and it becomes 0.0001, so ordinary calculus throws it away. A Brownian path makes so many small moves that their squares add up to the time elapsed, and they cannot be thrown away. Almost every stochastic calculus interview question tests whether you keep that one extra term. Keep it, and the questions turn into short calculations.
Stochastic calculus is calculus for quantities that move at random, such as a share price. In quantitative finance, it is the language of option pricing, so interviews for researcher, derivatives trader and pricing developer roles often include it. This page sorts the questions into five kinds, gives the six tools that answer them, and works four examples in full. Everything on this page is written in our own words; some set-ups are classic problems.
We sort the stochastic calculus questions we see in interview preparation books and in our own question bank into five kinds. This is our grouping, not a standard one.
Kinds 1 to 4 are the toolkit. Kind 5 puts the toolkit to work.
A standard Brownian motion starts at zero and has three more properties: its increments over time windows that do not overlap are independent; an increment over a window of length has the normal distribution with mean 0 and variance ; and the path is continuous. The full treatment, with the properties that surprise people, is on our free Brownian motion page.
Two facts follow and come up again and again:
Cut into equal steps. Each squared increment has mean . There are of them, so their sum has mean . Its variance shrinks to zero as the steps shrink. So the sum of squared increments is not random in the limit: it is exactly . This sum is called the quadratic variation.
In shorthand, . The other products vanish: and , because they shrink faster than . This multiplication table is the whole difference between ordinary calculus and stochastic calculus.
Let follow , and let be smooth. Expand to second order and apply the table above:
The term with is the one ordinary calculus does not have. It comes from . The full statement and its proof sketch are on our Ito's lemma page.
For two processes, the product rule gains the same kind of extra term: .
A martingale is a process whose best forecast of its future value is its value now. For an Ito process the test is short: write its term. If the term is not zero, the process is not a martingale. If it is zero, the process is a local martingale, and it is a true martingale under a mild size condition, for example .
Interviewers often want both halves: the drift calculation, and a sentence on the condition.
For a process that does not look into the future,
The stochastic integral also has mean zero under the same size condition. Together these two facts turn a variance question about an integral into an ordinary integral.
Girsanov's theorem says that you can change the probability weights so that a Brownian motion with a drift becomes one without a drift. Under the new weights, is a standard Brownian motion, for a constant , when the new measure has density with respect to the old one on . The volatility does not change. Only the drift does. Our Girsanov theorem page gives the general statement.
These four are written by us to show the tools in use. Try each one before you read the answer.
Example 1. Is a martingale?
Apply Ito's lemma to with : , , so . Then . The term is zero. The size condition holds because is finite. So yes, it is a martingale. Note what this says about alone: its drift is , so it is not one.
Example 2. Solve geometric Brownian motion.
A share price in the Black-Scholes model follows . Take , so and . Ito's lemma gives
so . The is the Ito term at work. A candidate who writes has dropped it, and in our view that is the slip to guard against first.
One consequence worth saying: the median of is , because has median zero. The median sits below whenever .
Example 3. The mean and variance of .
The mean is zero, because the integral is a stochastic integral and the size condition holds. For the variance, use the isometry: .
Check it a second way. Example 1 gives . Since is chi-squared with one degree of freedom, , so the variance is . Two routes agree, which is what an interviewer hopes to see.
Example 4. What is ?
Use the split from Tool 1. and are jointly normal, each with mean zero, with , so the correlation is . For two standard normals with correlation , the chance that both are positive is . Here , so the answer is .
A sanity check: if the two values were independent the answer would be . They are positively linked, so the answer must be above , and it is.
The Black-Scholes equation is the toolkit in one argument. Hold one option worth and sell shares. Ito's lemma gives the change in this portfolio as
Choose and the random part vanishes. A portfolio with no risk must earn the risk-free rate , or there is a free profit. Setting the change equal to gives
The real-world drift does not appear. Girsanov explains why: with , the share price follows under the risk-neutral measure, and prices are expectations under that measure. Our Black-Scholes equation and risk-neutral valuation pages take this further.
In our view, these five slips cost the most marks.
Membership is a paid subscription: see what Thuztra Learn is and what it costs. Nothing on this page promises an interview result or a job. Education only, not advice.
Learn six tools: the properties of Brownian motion, the rule that dW squared is dt, Ito's lemma, the zero-drift test for a martingale, the Ito isometry, and the change of drift from Girsanov. Then practise saying each step out loud, because the interviewer marks the reasoning as well as the answer.
The four defining properties, the three that catch people out, and why the one about squared increments is the one every pricing model actually rests on.
The chain rule for processes with non-zero quadratic variation, why the second derivative appears at first order, and the four places the theorem stops applying.
What an SDE actually asserts, when it has a solution, and the difference between solving it for a given noise path and only pinning down the law it produces.
Earn the squared-increment limit properly, then watch Ito's lemma fall out of an exact algebraic identity. The second-order term is not a correction to anything.
The property is one line and the consequences run through every pricing result we have. Also the three ways the word gets used to mean something it does not.
How a change of probability measure moves drift without touching volatility, the exact density that does it, and the conditions under which it quietly fails.
Nine books for quant interviews, grouped by the stage they help with, plus what the Green Book and Heard on the Street each are, from the author and catalogue records. No book problems copied.